Although she reports that her anxiety is gone, she still reports suicidal ideation, but states “with that valium stuff, who cares?”;;;
Diagnosis: Gambling disorder, alcohol use disorder
Decision Point One
Antabuse (Disulfiram) 250 mg orally every morning ON
Naltrexone (Vivitrol) injection, 380 mg intramuscularly in the gluteal region every 4 weeks
Antabuse (Disulfiram) 250 mg orally daily
Campral (Acamprosate) 666 mg orally three times/day
E
· Client returns to clinic in four weeks
· Mrs. Perez states that she has noticed that she has been having suicidal ideation over the past week, and it seems to be getting worse
· Clientis She is also reporting that she is having “out of control” anxiety..
Decision Point Two
RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Decision Point Two
Select what the PMHNP should do next:
Add on Valium (diazepam) 5 mg orally TID/PRN/anxiety
Refer to a counselor to address gambling issues
Add on Chantix (varenicline) 1 mg orally BID
- Client returns to clinic in four weeks
- Mrs. Perez reports that when she first received the valium, it helped her tremendously. She states “I was like a new person- this is a miracle drug!” However, she reports that she has trouble “waiting” between drug administration times and sometimes takes her valium early. She is asking today for you to increase the valium dose or frequency
- Although she reports that her anxiety is gone, she still reports suicidal ideation, but states “with that valium stuff, who cares?”;;;;;;;;
- Decision Point Three
- Add on Wellbutrin (bupropion) XL 150 mg orally daily
- Guidance to Student
- Given her weight (less than 60 kg), Campral should have been started at 666 mg orally BID. It is possible that the higher dose may be responsible for the severity of the symptoms that Mrs. Perez is experiencing.
- Technically, the drug should have been stopped (not simply decreased) once Mrs. Perez reported suicidal ideation. Even with the decrease in dose, she is still having suicidal ideation, which indicates the need to discontinue the drug. Although controversy exists regarding how long to use pharmacologic approaches to treatment of alcohol dependence, 8 weeks is probably insufficient, therefore, the drug should not simply be discontinued without using a different agent in its place.
- Mrs. Perez should be started on Antabuse at 250 mg orally daily and referred to psychotherapy to address her gambling issue.
- In all cases, the PMHNP needs to discuss smoking cessation options with Mrs. Perez in order to address the totality of addictions and to enhance her overall health. The decision to begin Wellbutrin XL 150 mg orally daily may help achieve this goal, but this choice does not address her abstinence from alcohol.
- Additionally, it should be noted that although Mrs. Perez reports that she has been avoiding the casino secondary to her fear that she will drink, this “fear” has not actually treated her gambling addiction. This particular addiction has resulted in considerable personal financial cost to Ms. Perez. Mrs. Perez needs to be referred to a counselor who specializes in the treatment of gambling disorder, and she should also be encouraged to establish herself with a local chapter of Gamblers Anonymous.
- Examine Case Study: A Puerto Rican Woman With Comorbid Addiction. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
- At each decision point stop to complete the following:
- Decision #1
- Which decision did you select?
- Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
- Decision #2
- Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
- Decision #3
- Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
- Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?