create a 500-750 word communication plan for disseminating your action plan to all of the stakeholders.

Details:
Using your completed action plan, create a 500-750 word communication plan for disseminating your action plan to all of the stakeholders. Which strategies do you plan to utilize and why? Your plan should demonstrate how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan.
In addition, explain how the communication plan addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal. What leadership or managerial skills will you draw upon in implementing this plan?
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Benchmark – Strategic Planning: Communication Plan

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content

25.0 %A Description of Strategies You Plan to Utilize and Why, Including How You Plan to Use Formal and Informal Communication Channels to Implement the Plan (Competency 2.4: Communicate effectively with multiple stakeholders.)
Plan does not include a description of strategies you plan to utilize and why, including how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of strategies you plan to utilize and why, including how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an elemental description of strategies you plan to utilize and why, including how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides a description of strategies you plan to utilize and why, including how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of strategies you plan to utilize and why, including how you plan to use formal and informal communication channels to implement the plan. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %An Explanation of How the Communication Plan Addresses What You Are Hoping to Achieve With Your Strategic Goal
Plan does not provide an explanation of how the communication addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal.
Plan provides an explanation of how the communication plan addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an elemental explanation of how the communication plan addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an explanation of how the communication plan addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed an explanation of how the communication plan addresses what you are hoping to achieve with your strategic goal. Plan offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about this vision. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %An Explanation of the Leadership or Managerial Skills You Will Draw Upon in Implementing This Plan
Plan does not develop an explanation of the leadership or managerial skills you will draw upon in implementing this plan.
Plan develops an incomplete or insufficient explanation of the leadership or managerial skills you will draw upon in implementing this plan. Plan does not include justification of how each goal or objective will help achieve the qualities of professional excellence and integrity. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an elemental explanation of the leadership or managerial skills you will draw upon in implementing this plan. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an explanation of the leadership or managerial skills you will draw upon in implementing this plan. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of the leadership or managerial skills you will draw upon in implementing this plan. Plan offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about these goals and objectives. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper. Thesis statement is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now