Week 1: Discussion

August 28, 2022/in /by

Requirements:

Part 1: Using Brown and Olshansky’s (1997) model, describe what interventions you plan to do during your first year of practice to help you navigate the changes described during in each phase.

Part 2: We are seeing rapid change in primary care as stakeholders are demanding higher quality healthcare at reduced costs. After reading the Cuenca (2017) and Shi, et al. (2017) articles, provide a synthesis-level evaluation of how you believe the patient-centered medical home and value-based payment models will: (1) impact your personal practice as a nurse practitioner, and (2) transform the way primary care is delivered in the United States.

Part 3: After reading the AANP (2015) and White, et al. (2017) articles, what are your thoughts on the economic benefits of using nurse practitioners in healthcare practices? How would you respond to this question if asked in a job interview? Support your response in Part 3 with evidence from the literature.

Required Articles for you to respond to paper:

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2015). Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements.

Brown, M., & Olshansky, E. (1997). From limbo to legitimacy: a theoretical model of the transition to the primary care nurse practitioner role. Nursing Research, 46(1), 46-51. https://uw.instructure.com/courses/812898/files/22971045/download

Shi, L., Lee, D., Chung, M., Liang, H., Lock, D., & Sripipatana, A. (2017). Patient-centered medical home recognition and clinical performance in U.S. community health centers. Health Services Research, 52(3), 984-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12523

White, D.L., Torabi, E., & Froehle, C.M. (2017). Ice-breaker vs. standalone: comparing alternative workflow modes of mid-level care providers. Production and Operations Management, 26(11), 2089-2106.

If any information needs to be specifically applied to a specific state, that state would be Michigan.

All references must be scholarly articles not more than 5 years old.

Week 1: Discussion

August 28, 2022/in /by

Requirements:

Part 1: Using Brown and Olshansky’s (1997) model, describe what interventions you plan to do during your first year of practice to help you navigate the changes described during in each phase.

Part 2: We are seeing rapid change in primary care as stakeholders are demanding higher quality healthcare at reduced costs. After reading the Cuenca (2017) and Shi, et al. (2017) articles, provide a synthesis-level evaluation of how you believe the patient-centered medical home and value-based payment models will: (1) impact your personal practice as a nurse practitioner, and (2) transform the way primary care is delivered in the United States.

Part 3: After reading the AANP (2015) and White, et al. (2017) articles, what are your thoughts on the economic benefits of using nurse practitioners in healthcare practices? How would you respond to this question if asked in a job interview? Support your response in Part 3 with evidence from the literature.

Required Articles for you to respond to paper:

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2015). Nurse Practitioner Cost Effectiveness. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements.

Brown, M., & Olshansky, E. (1997). From limbo to legitimacy: a theoretical model of the transition to the primary care nurse practitioner role. Nursing Research, 46(1), 46-51. https://uw.instructure.com/courses/812898/files/22971045/download

Shi, L., Lee, D., Chung, M., Liang, H., Lock, D., & Sripipatana, A. (2017). Patient-centered medical home recognition and clinical performance in U.S. community health centers. Health Services Research, 52(3), 984-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12523

White, D.L., Torabi, E., & Froehle, C.M. (2017). Ice-breaker vs. standalone: comparing alternative workflow modes of mid-level care providers. Production and Operations Management, 26(11), 2089-2106.

If any information needs to be specifically applied to a specific state, that state would be Michigan.

All references must be scholarly articles not more than 5 years old.

Week 1 Discussion

June 24, 2020/in Cheap Assignment Tutors /by Brainy

Scenario: Consider the moral and ethical issues, dilemmas, controversies, and questions raised in this week’s reading and video materials. Let us suppose that you were to find a magic ring like the Ring of Gyges. Instead of allowing you to do whatever you wish while the ring is turned, this particular ring gives you the power to to make one change in the morality and ethics of everybody for all time. You can make one thing absolutely acceptable or absolutely forbidden, so that everybody, everywhere, from this day forward and forevermore, would have no choice but to act in this one particular way. You could, for example, strike forever from the hearts and minds of humanity even the bare idea of lying, stealing, cheating, gambling, adultery, alcoholism, addiction of any kind, gluttony, sloth, or any other behavior you think should be absolutely and forever wrong or right.

What is the one change in morality that you would make by using the power of that ring?

As you think about answering this question, make sure that the change you’re imagining is a moral change. In other words, don’t write about what you wish would be true — such as that no one should ever have to suffer, or that we should all have equal access to wealth or health care. Instead, choose a change that would make the world different either by eliminating what you take to be an immoral behavior or by adding a new moral behavior.

Your initial post should address the following elements:

1. In your own words, briefly describe cultural relativism then briefly summarize one of the challenges to cultural relativism made by Rachels in his article “Challenges to Cultural Relativism”
2. Using the magical Ring of Gyges, describe the one moral change you would made in the world; try to describe this change as if it were a law such as “No one can…” or “Everyone must…”
3. Provide 2 reasons for making this change.
4. Briefly describe the world before and after the change.
5. Using at least one quote from the text or from Rachels’ article, discuss whether the world you have created is better than our current world.