In this assignment, you will compare and evaluate risk management techniques from experts in the field
Week 4 – Assignment
Business and Finance Homework Help
Identifying and Managing Risk
In this assignment, you will compare and evaluate risk management techniques from experts in the field. Go to the Ashford University Library and find one article by Dr. James Kallman. Dr. Kallman, an expert in the field of risk management, has written many articles on managing financial risk. Find a second article in the Ashford University Library from another credible author of your choice who also provides recommendations for risk management.
Develop a three- to four-page analysis (excluding the title and reference pages), of the techniques Dr. Kallman has identified for managing risks. In this analysis, compare Dr.Kallman’s techniques to the techniques recommended in the second article you researched. Explain why you agree or disagree with each authors’ recommendations. Describe other factors you believe should be considered in risk management. The assignment should be comprehensive and include specific examples. The paper should be formatted according to APA.
You must cite at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the text, from the Ashford University Library, one being an article by Dr. Kallman. Cite your sources in-text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description:
Total Possible Score: 6.00
Compares Dr. Kallman’s Financial Risk Management Techniques to Another Credible Author’s Recommended Financial Risk Management Techniques
Total: 2.20
Distinguished – Provides a comprehensive comparison of Dr. Kallman’s financial risk management techniques to another credible author’s recommended financial risk management techniques. The techniques include specific examples and are supported with scholarly sources.
Proficient – Provides a comparison of Dr. Kallman’s financial risk management techniques to another credible author’s recommended financial risk management techniques. The techniques include specific examples and are supported with scholarly sources. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Provides a limited comparison of Dr. Kallman’s financial risk management techniques to another credible author’s recommended financial risk management techniques. The techniques are somewhat supported with examples and scholarly sources. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a comparison of Dr. Kallman’s financial risk management techniques to another credible author’s recommended financial risk management techniques; however, the techniques are not supported with examples or scholarly sources, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The comparison of Dr. Kallman’s financial risk management techniques to another credible author’s recommended financial risk management techniques is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Agreement or Disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and Another Credible Author’s Financial Risk Management Recommendations
Total: 1.80
Distinguished – Comprehensively explains the agreement or disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and another credible author’s financial risk management recommendations. The explanation includes specific examples and is supported with scholarly sources.
Proficient – Explains the agreement or disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and another credible author’s financial risk management recommendations. The explanations include specific examples and are supported with scholarly sources. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially explains the agreement or disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and another credible author’s financial risk management recommendations. The explanations are somewhat supported with examples and scholarly sources. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the agreement or disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and another credible author’s financial risk management recommendations; however, the explanations are not supported with examples or scholarly sources, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of agreement or disagreement with Dr. Kallman’s and another credible author’s financial risk management recommendations is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes Other Factors that Should be Considered in Financial Risk Management
Total: 1.40
Distinguished – Provides a comprehensive description of other factors that should be considered in financial risk management. The description includes specific examples and is supported with relevant scholarly sources.
Proficient – Provides a description of other factors that should be considered in financial risk management. The description includes specific examples and is supported with scholarly sources. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Provides a limited description of other factors that should be considered in financial risk management. The description is minimally includes examples and scholarly sources. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a description of other factors that should be considered in financial risk management; however, the description does not include specific examples or scholarly sources and/or significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of previously unidentified factors that should be considered in financial risk management is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Source Requirement
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
