W3 Assignment

W3 Assignment

W3 Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction: Choose one recent (within 5 years) quantitative article related to any of the national practice problems.Requirements:a. Introduce selected practice problemb. Literature chosen is < 5 years oldc. Provides incidence and/or prevalence of practice problem 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements with a very good introduction. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes 2 requirements with a basic introduction. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Poor introduction and/or includes 1 or fewer requirements.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterary Search Strategy

Literary Search Strategy: Describe your library strategy for searching for the quantitative evidenceRequirements:Includes literature search strategy used:a. Identify databases searched to locate the recent quantitative literatureb. Include key words used in your searchc. Describe filters used 30 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent appraisal of the quantitative article. 27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the literature search. 24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes 3 requirements and a basic description of the literature search. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor description of the literature search.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of Article Using the John Hopkins Appraisal

Tool: Use the Johns Hopkins Appraisal tool to conduct a critique of the quantitative article.Requirements:a. Present the aim of the studyb. Share research method and design usedc. Provide Sample size & description of sampled. Present an overview of the findings/outcomese. Share strengths and limitations of the studye. Appraise the level and grade the quality of the study 30 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the literature search strategy. 27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good appraisal of the quantitative article. 24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements and provides a basic appraisal of the quantitative article. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 3 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor appraisal of the quantitative article.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarySummary: Summarize in your own words the article findingsRequirements:1. Provide a summary detailing the main points and overall findings2. Discuss if this is a solution that can contribute to the practice problem 40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary of the quantitative article. 36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary of the quantitative article. 32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 of the requirements and provides a basic summary of the quantitative article. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor summary of the quantitative article.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionConclusion: Effectively summarize the content in the paperRequirements:a. Provides a clear and logical conclusion in no more than 1-2 concise paragraphsb. Highlight the summary of findingsc. Highlights overall quality (level and grade)d. Conclude the value of the study to practice problem 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all the requirements and provides an excellent conclusion. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 2 requirements and provides a basic conclusion. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor conclusion.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and organization for scholarly papers

Requirements:a. Use level I headers for each sectionb. References and citations are in correct APA format per the current APA manualc. Length of APA formatted paper is 2-3 pages (excluding title page and references) 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes 3 requirements and very good APA style and standards. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements of APA style and standards. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes one or fewer requirements of APA style and standards.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing

Requirements:a. Use of standard English grammar and sentence structureb. No spelling errors or typographical errorsc. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and basic clarity of writing 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendixAppendix: Evidence supportRequirements: Embed the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool as an appendix 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes the completed John Hopkins Appraisal tool as an appendix 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not include the John Hopkins Appraisal tool in the appendix or includes an incomplete Johns Hopkins tool in the appendix

10 pts

Total Points: 150

PreviousNext

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now

W3 Assignment

W3 Assignment

Use the ladder of abstraction to describe the relationships between perception, communication and action in one interpersonal encounter in your life. First, describe the situation as fully as you can-remember, I was not there, so no you will need to provide enough detail that I understand what was happening. Next, describe the behaviors and environmental cue you noticed. Finally, identify the way you labeled what was happening and others who were there. Now consider alternate selective perception you might have made and how they might have influenced your labels and actions. Would you differently if faced with this situation again? Your paper should be a 2-3 page paper citing specific examples and providing detailed analysis incorporation reading and textbook material. If outside sources are used, proper citation of the source should be included. Please refer to video.

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now